Imagine this scenario… You discover errors on your credit reports by one or more of your lenders. You challenge them and ask the credit bureaus to correct or remove them. Thirty days later the credit bureaus send you a reply confirming that what they have on file is accurate and it will not be removed or changed. They also direct you to contact your lender if you have any further questions regarding that allegedly incorrect credit reporting. You take the same course of action with the lenders reporting the incorrect information and, again, you are unsuccessful in getting the items corrected.

The scenario just described happens thousands of times every week. And while the Fair Credit Reporting Act is designed to protect consumers from credit bureau and lender negligence, the number of valid challenges to credit report data is not decreasing. Unfortunately, the number of challenges that result in credit reporting data being amended in favor of the consumer pale in comparison to the number that remain the same.

At this point the consumer has two very simple options; they can either live with the erroneous information until the state or Federal credit reporting statute of limitations expires, normally seven years, or they can escalate their efforts to have their credit reports corrected by filing a lawsuit.

Many experts are predicting that 2009 will yield an increase in consumer credit lawsuits due, in part, to consumers feeling the sting of increasingly difficult access to credit because of the credit crunch and a willingness to incur the costs of litigation to restore their good credit standing. “To some people it’s an investment, do the math. If it costs you $20,000 in legal costs to force a lender or credit bureau to remove an inaccurate collection and the removal allows you to qualify for a mortgage interest rate that saves you $100,000, you tell me, was that a wise investment?

In fact, it’s possible that you’ll recover all of your legal costs as part of a settlement if your case is strong. It seems logical that the credit bureaus would not prefer a jury determine punitive damages in a case where they have sold credit reports to a lender that contained inaccurate information, but there is also a risk that the judge will grant only a portion or none of your Attorneys fees and then you’re out that part of the money. The trade off for the credit reporting industry is legal fees and a controlled settlement amount, versus the unknown of taking the case to trial where the odds are not certain that at least one of the members of the jury has not had a similar experience with a credit bureau or lender.

The credit bureaus are sued hundreds of times each year with the majority of those lawsuits being filed in Georgia, California and Illinois. “It’s not a coincidence that the filings are disproportionate to those states given that’s where the three national credit reporting agencies are based”, says John Ulzheimer, President of Consumer Education at Credit.com and the Owner of www.CreditExpertWitness.com, a consumer credit expert witness referral service. The credit bureaus also maintain insurance against such lawsuits so the costs can be limited to premiums and deductibles in many cases. Having said that, it’s certainly not a comfortable feeling knowing that you’re about to go to war with a company large enough to easily absorb the cost of litigation. “It’s a rounding error to them and you better be prepared”, states Ulzheimer.

So how do you know if you’re prepared to sue your lender or one of the credit bureaus? Here’s a checklist. If you can’t answer yes to each of these then litigation may not be for you.

1. Have you documented all of your calls with the lender and credit bureau? This means every conversation you’ve had with them since you started your attempts to have the errors corrected. This can be as simple as a handwritten summary of the conversation with dates and names.

2. Have you attempted to have the item corrected using the standard protocols? You can’t simply file a lawsuit against the credit bureau without giving them the opportunity to correct their error. Be sure that you’ve exhausted your rights to challenge credit report items as defined in the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

3. Have you suffered any damages due to the incorrect item? If not, then think twice about filing a lawsuit. Damages can be credit declinations, credit approvals with disadvantaged rates, higher insurance premiums, or the loss of a job due to credit report pre-employment screening. Can you document these things?

4. Can you tie the damages to the incorrect item? Are there other seriously negative items on your credit reports that are completely accurate that can be blamed for your damages?

5. Do you have copies of your credit reports and FICO scores and can you put together a chronology of credit reports and scores? If you can’t, then you can subpoena the credit bureaus for archived credit reports and scores, although they will object profusely.

6. Are you absolutely certain that what’s being reported is incorrect? Before you file a lawsuit you need to do a reality check. If the items are accurate but simply not to your liking, save your money.

7. Does your case have a chance? An expert witness can assess this for you before you spend a dime on a lawyer and can give you an honest assessment of your chances for success and ways to better prepare for litigation.

1. As long as the companies that build the credit scoring models continue to treat medical collections as normal collections, they’ll continue to hurt your scores. Unfortunately, the blame doesn’t lie solely on the credit scoring models…the credit reporting agencies are also part of the problem.
2. Read on…Credit reporting agencies are just as guilty for the way medical collections are handled because they allow collection agencies to report the medical collections. If they are reported in your credit report the credit scoring models will see these accounts and they will continue to damage your scores. If the credit bureaus would implement a policy that would NOT allow medical collections to be reported if the collections were caused by insurance claim errors. This would require the doctor’s office and the collector to prove that the collection is valid before it could be reported which is exactly what the Fair Credit Reporting Act was intended to do. Sadly, this will never happen. Keep reading…
3. If the credit scoring companies and the credit bureaus ever did change the negative impact of medical collections on credit scores, the collection agencies would hit the roof. Think about it, if medical collections didn’t hurt your score, what motivation would people have top pay them? The problem is that collection agencies represent a hefty client base for the bureaus and generate a pretty large revenue stream. If the credit bureaus ever decided to change how medical collections are reported or treated, you can bet that the collection agencies would throw their proverbial weight around.